Call Attorney Marni Jo Snyder 24 Hours / 7 Days:
215.515.3360
Under Pennsylvania law, an accomplice is someone who intentionally helps another person commit a crime. This is a very broad assessment. Typically, prosecutors attempt to show that the accused encouraged the crime, helped plan the offense, provided transportation, acted as a lookout, supplied weapons or tools, or otherwise assisted another person in carrying out the crime.
The issue often comes down to intent. Simply knowing someone involved in criminal activity is generally not enough and some relationship to the crime needs to be established. Prosecutors must prove that the accused person intentionally helped commit the offense. This concept is commonly known as aiding and abetting, but the legal concept is known as accomplice liability. It allows the Commonwealth to hold multiple people responsible for the same criminal act.
This issue frequently arises in Philadelphia cases involving multiple arrests. Police sometimes charge everyone present and leave it to the courts to sort out who actually participated. Distinguishing mere presence from intentional assistance often becomes one of the central issues in the case.
Accomplice liability is often misunderstood because many people assume that criminal responsibility only applies to the individual who physically committed the offense. In reality, Pennsylvania law allows prosecutors to pursue charges against anyone they believe intentionally aided or facilitated criminal conduct. As a result, someone who never entered a building, never carried a weapon, or never physically harmed another person may still find themselves facing serious felony charges.
For a free legal consultation, call 215.515.3360
One of the most common questions people ask after an arrest is: “Can I really be charged for someone else’s crime?”
In Pennsylvania, the answer can be yes.
If law enforcement believes someone knowingly participated in criminal activity alongside another person, prosecutors may file charges against everyone allegedly involved. This often occurs in cases where multiple individuals are accused of acting together.
This concept is known legally as “criminal responsibility for conduct of another” and frequently used in Philadelphia criminal cases involving robbery, assault, shootings, burglary, narcotics offenses, and homicide investigations. Accomplice liability can expose defendants to the same penalties as the primary offender.
Although people often use the terms interchangeably, accomplices and accessories are not necessarily treated the same under Pennsylvania law.
An accomplice is someone who intentionally helps another person commit a crime before or during its commission. Under Pennsylvania’s accomplice liability statute (18 Pa.C.S. § 306), accomplices are generally treated the same as the principal offender. That means an accomplice may face the same charges and penalties as the person who actually committed the crime.
For example, if two people commit a robbery and one serves as the lookout while the other enters the store, both can be charged with robbery, even though only one physically took the property.
Historically, the law distinguished between “accessories before the fact” and “accessories after the fact.” Pennsylvania has largely eliminated the separate category of accessory before the fact by treating those individuals as accomplices.
However, someone who assists a person after a crime has already occurred is generally not considered an accomplice to the original offense. Instead, they may be charged with separate crimes such as:
For example, if someone hides a friend from police after a robbery or helps destroy evidence, they usually are not charged with robbery itself. Instead, they may face charges related to helping the offender avoid arrest.
Considering that both can be related, people often confuse accomplice liability with criminal conspiracy, but they are different legal concepts.
In some cases, prosecutors charge both offenses simultaneously. They often argue that the defendants planned the crime together and assisted each other in carrying it out. Because conspiracy charges can broaden the scope of evidence prosecutors attempt to introduce, these cases often become legally complex and require experienced legal representation for the best outcomes.
Accomplice liability becomes especially significant in homicide cases. Pennsylvania prosecutors may pursue accomplice theories in first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and felony murder prosecutions.
The answer depends largely on the underlying crime. Under Pennsylvania law, accomplices may face the same charges and penalties as the person who directly committed the offense. The penalties can include lengthy prison sentences, substantial fines, probation, mandatory minimum penalties, and life imprisonment in certain homicide cases.
Because accomplice allegations can carry the same penalties as direct participation, speaking with a criminal defense attorney Philadelphia residents trust becomes especially important. Call our offices today at 1-215-515-3360 to go over your case with an experienced attorney.
Prosecutors must prove that the accused knowingly and intentionally participated in criminal activity. It is the job of the Defense attorney to challenge that assumption.
Defense attorneys argue whether the accused knew a crime would occur, or they voluntarily participated, if witness testimony is reliable, or if digital evidence has been misinterpreted, and if prosecutors are overstating the accused’s role.
Philadelphia criminal defense attorneys also examine digital evidence, surveillance footage, and inconsistent statements to challenge the prosecution’s theory. In some cases, proving that someone withdrew from participation before the crime occurred may become a key point.
Accomplice liability cases tend to develop rapidly. Law enforcement often seeks statements, cellphone records, social media evidence, and witness testimony shortly after an arrest.
At the same time, prosecutors may attempt to pressure defendants to cooperate or provide information about others involved. Decisions made during the earliest stages of an investigation can have enormous consequences later.
The sooner an experienced criminal defense attorney becomes involved, the sooner they can begin evaluating the evidence and challenging the prosecution’s theory. Early intervention can be particularly important when serious charges involving violence or homicide are involved.
At the Law Offices of M.J. Snyder, LLC, our experienced Philadelphia criminal defense attorneys understand how aggressively prosecutors pursue accomplice liability allegations. We regularly defend individuals accused of participating in robberies, assaults, firearm offenses, conspiracy cases, and homicide investigations. Don’t let someone else’s mistake become yours.
If you have been accused of helping someone commit a crime, it is important to understand that the penalties can be just as serious as if you had committed the offense yourself. These cases are often built on assumptions, circumstantial evidence, and allegations about intent. Speaking with an experienced criminal defense attorney in Philadelphia as early as possible can help protect your rights and ensure that the prosecution is held to its burden of proof.
Contact our office today to schedule a confidential consultation, get in touch with us here at the Law Offices of M.J. Snyder, LLC.
Call 24/7: 215.515.3360
Email: info@snyderlawyer.com
Fax: 215-376-6981
This website is for general informational purposes only. The act of sending an e-mail to the Firm or any attorney at the Firm, or submitting a form response or other materials through the website, will not create an attorney-client relationship. The only way to create an attorney-client relationship with the Firm is through a written agreement.Read More